Industry · Government & Defense

Cleared. Evidenced. Defensible.

Security control frameworks and agency specific policy translated into structured instruction. Cleared workforce training with coverage tagged to role and evidence that survives external review.

Isometric dashboard tiles rendered as physical charcoal objects with data visualizations, one glowing orange, illustrating knowledge governance.
Why this matters

Public accountability demands more than completion records.

Government and defense training is scrutinized by performance audit (the GAO in the United States, national audit offices elsewhere), by legislative committee, by interoperability assessment across joint forces, and by internal agency review. A completion register does not answer the questions those reviews ask. A framework tied to policy, tagged to roles, and evidenced at the individual level does.

The Foundry treats security control frameworks, agency specific policy, and operational directives as sources of structural obligation. Frameworks encode who must know what, to what standard, with what evidence. Program output is downstream of the framework, and the framework is what survives external scrutiny.

Six moves for government and defense

Workforce enablement anchored to policy and led by evidence.

Deployment for protected environments

Deployment posture accommodates protected environments and data residency requirements. Assessment and technical documentation support agency security assessment as part of onboarding.

Cleared workforce enablement

Programs structured for cleared personnel (mandatory security training, handling of protective marking, awareness of insider threat) with coverage tagged to role and evidenced completion.

Traceability from policy to instruction

Security control frameworks (NIST SP 800-53 and CMMC in the US, the UAE Information Assurance Regulation, NIS2 in the EU, the PSPF and ISM in Australia) and agency specific policy parsed at clause level. Each module, each assessment, each scenario traces to the policy control it exists to serve.

Training adjacent to export control

For programs that touch technical data under export control (ITAR and EAR in the US, the EU Dual Use Regulation, the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act in Japan) the framework enforces authorship boundaries and evidences delivery limited by access.

Evidence for external review

For performance audits by the GAO or a national audit office, legislative review, or interoperability assessments across joint forces, evidence exports in a coherent, versioned form that survives external scrutiny.

Variants across many classifications

Where the same program runs across classifications or across coalition partners, variants live on one framework. Governance stays central. Expression specific to environment is controlled.

How it runs

From policy stack to defensible evidence.

Structure precedes instruction. Only once your security, learning, and capability leads have approved the framework does the platform generate the material that satisfies it.

STEP 01

Interpret the policy stack

Security control frameworks, agency specific policy, and operational directives are ingested and parsed at clause level, with provenance retained across the chain.

STEP 02

Structure by role and clearance

Obligations, controls, and training expectations are tagged to specific roles and clearance levels. Coverage is measurable at the level where accountability sits.

STEP 03

Construct the framework

A structured framework is proposed, reviewed by your security, learning, and capability leads, and approved before instruction and verification are generated.

STEP 04

Evidence for external review

Coverage, verification history, sign off chains, and version records export in a form ready for audit office review, legislative reporting, or interoperability assessment across joint forces.

What you get out

Evidence prepared for the review you have not yet been notified of.

Frameworks aligned to national security standards and agency specific policy. Programs that satisfy them, per role, per clearance, per environment. Verification that survives external audit. Evidence packs that reconstruct each decision. Who trained on what, when, to what threshold, with what sign off.

When audit office or legislative scrutiny arrives, the artifact is a framework, not a defense rebuilt from a completion register.

Common questions

How government and defense engagements work, in detail.

The Foundry does not represent itself as authorized or assessed under any government security program (such as FedRAMP in the US or IRAP in Australia) and does not hold agency security clearances on the platform's behalf. Deployment posture, data residency options, and controls are documented for assessor review as part of agency onboarding, and enterprise engagements include security due diligence appropriate to the classification of the material involved.
Where programs touch data under export control (ITAR, EAR, the EU Dual Use Regulation, or equivalent national regimes) the framework enforces authorship boundaries and controls delivery to individuals authorized for access. The evidence trail supports external review by the relevant export control authority.
Controls from frameworks such as NIST SP 800-53, CMMC, NIS2, and the ISM are parsed at clause level, and the framework encodes which roles are accountable for which controls. Instruction and assessment are generated to satisfy the specific control, and coverage is exportable per control, per role, per environment.
When source documents update (a control framework revision, an agency policy change, a reorganization of government functions) the system parses the source again and diffs against the existing framework. Affected obligations and modules are surfaced explicitly so remediation is targeted, not wholesale.
Deployment options are discussed on a per agency basis and are covered in the Technical Overview. Deployment into protected environments, sovereign hosting, and offline delivery arrangements are considered as part of engagement scoping.
Bring a policy instrument

See your obligations structure themselves.

Send us a policy instrument, an operational directive, or a training obligation your cleared workforce is accountable for. In 45 minutes on your material, you leave with the framework the Foundry produces.

We reply within one business day.